簡單來說，論文的提綱就是文章整體的一個骨架，通常是將文章的主要內容的框架顯現出來，讓人能夠更清楚地了解文章各部分的一個大概內容。因此英文論文也不例外，也有提綱和相關格式要求，下面就為大家簡單介紹一下。

　　這里給大家整理了一個比較常見的英文論文提綱格式，可參考如下：

　　I. Introduction

　　引入論文的主題

　　陳述論點

　　II. Body. Main Idea

　　寫一個主題句(論文的論點)

　　支持這個論點：數據，事實，例子

　　解釋它們與你的論文有何關聯

　　III. Body. Main Idea

　　寫一個主題句(論文的分論點)

　　支持這個論點：數據，事實，例子

　　解釋它們與你的論文有何關聯

　　IV. Body. Main Idea

　　寫一個主題句(論文的分論點)

　　支持這個論點，或者用數據、事實、例子來解釋為什么相反的論點不起作用

　　解釋它們與你的論文有何關聯

　　V. Conclusion

　　總結所有要點

　　重申你的論點

　　增加號召力：你希望讀者在讀完你的文章后做什么

　　關于論文提綱的寫作就是要靈活，結構清晰合理，可以進行適當地刪減，并沒有一個硬性的格式與要求規定，跟據作者自身寫作大概方向來看即可。下面給大家分享一個英文論文提綱范例，可進行參考，如下：

　　ESSAY OUTLINE EXAMPLE

　　I. Introduction

　　Topic question: Is downloading music without permission theft?

　　●There are many arguments on this subject.

　　●Invention of the internet and copying of audi-ile formats made downloadingand sharing music very easy.

　　Thesis statement: Downloading music for free is equal to stealing,

　　II. Main ldea #1: Downloading music for free is a legal issue.

　　A. Supporting points:

　　●Theft is taking something from someone who is the rightful owner withouttheir permission.

　　●Artists own the rights to their own music.

　　●Music is under copyright + Music is intellectual property, and taking it withoutpermission should be considered a criminal act.

　　III. Main Idea #2: Downloading music for free is an ethical issue.

　　A. Supporting points:

　　●Principles of morality, i.e. what is right and what is wrong.

　　●There is no difference between taking the music for free off the internet andtaking it for free out of a store.

　　●Intellectual property should be treated the same way as tangible property.

　　IV. Main Idea #3: Downloading music for free results in a loss of income.

　　A. Supporting point:

　　●Musicians love making music →but if people download their music for free,music won't be a stable source of income, record companies will also losemoney.

　　●Therefore many jobs related to the music industry will be affected.

　　●Talent will be underdeveloped→so, downloading music without permission will lead to fewer good musicians→we'll have less good music to listen to.

　　V. Conclusion

　　●Downloading music for free is wrong both ethically and morally, and deprives both the artist and the recording companies of income.

　　●Restate Thesis: Downloading music for free is equal to stealing.